Wednesday, September 9, 2026

China Tried To Silence The Philippines. It Backfired

    SHAME ON CHINA : China Tried To Silence The Philippines. It Backfired       

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw5paMSWJto

 

...

TRANSCRIPT

works in international law unfortunately just like
9 seconds
I think this is from China in an international law how will you treat this kind of behavior it not only
16 seconds
disrespects shows if this is a Chinese position sent to me
32 seconds
You know what every bully fears? Being called out not in private or behind closed doors but in front of everyone.
39 seconds
And that is exactly what has happened to China at a defense summit recently. Now the Chinese as you know have a longunning dispute with the Philippines.
48 seconds
So China tried to have the last word.
50 seconds
The Philippines hit back and that takedown has now gone viral. Tonight, we'll tell you what happened and why it's making waves. Our story is set in South Korea.
1 minute, 1 second
It was hosting the Soul Defense Dialogue in the South Korean capital, Soul. The Philippine Defense Secretary was on
1 minute, 8 seconds
stage. This man, Gilberto Theodoro. He was speaking on stage. That's when a man in a white coat walked up behind him.
1 minute, 16 seconds
The man was a Chinese delegate. He placed a sheet of paper on the table beside the Philippine leader. Tooro
1 minute, 24 seconds
looked down. The paper had a note from China. Now, Toodoro could have ignored it. He could have looked away. But he did something else.
1 minute, 32 seconds
The Filipino defense chief chose to read it out aloud. Listen to this.
1 minute, 38 seconds
I I have a note here. Uh I think this is from China. Uh you should have joined the uh uh and may I read it. China's
1 minute, 46 seconds
position on the South China Sea arbitration is clear, consistent and firm. They have no position. The arbitration violates fundamental
1 minute, 54 seconds
principles of international law. So what you signed unclause you mean violates international law. That's what you mean.
2 minutes, 3 seconds
The so-called award is illegal, null and void. So say you and has no binding force because you don't want to be subjected to an clause.
2 minutes, 13 seconds
Now some context. This is a territorial dispute over the South China Sea.
2 minutes, 19 seconds
Beijing claims most of it. It says it has historic rights over these waters dating back centuries. But other
2 minutes, 25 seconds
countries contest this claim. Let's take you to our map room to understand where all of this is. This is the South China
2 minutes, 32 seconds
Sea. Beijing claims most of it. It has created what it calls the nine dash line. All official Chinese maps have
2 minutes, 41 seconds
this line, the nine dash line. China says this line marks its sovereign claims. It shows the territory that
2 minutes, 49 seconds
belongs to China. The problem is that this line takes up almost 90% of the South China Sea. So basically, China stakes a claim on 90% of this region.
3 minutes
Of course, the world doesn't agree.
3 minutes, 2 seconds
Several countries in the region dispute Beijing's claims. Over the years, those disputes have led to naval standoffs.
3 minutes, 8 seconds
So in 2013, the Philippines had had enough. It took the dispute to the H to the permanent court of arbitration.
3 minutes, 18 seconds
Manila accused China of violating international maritime law. Those rules are set out under UN clause.
3 minutes, 27 seconds
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, UNOS, it's called UNCL clause. So Manila Manila said that
3 minutes, 36 seconds
China's 9- line violates the law. The case went on for three years and then in 2016 the court ruled in favor of the Philippines. It declared that China's so-called ancient rights do not matter.
3 minutes, 47 seconds
What matters are the UN rules.
3 minutes, 52 seconds
Rules that both China and the Philippines had ratified. Now this verdict was an embarrassment for China. So it rejected it.
4 minutes
And that's what the Philippines defense chief was talking about. This unclause verdict. He rebutted China's claims on stage.
4 minutes, 9 seconds
Neither accepts nor recognizes the award. Of course, because you lost and opposes it and will never accept any
4 minutes, 17 seconds
claim or action arising from it. These are words slip to me and there is a legal principle called
4 minutes, 26 seconds
resips. The thing speaks for itself. How can you deal with a country in an
4 minutes, 32 seconds
international forum beyond the question asked to me disrespecting the organizers of this
4 minutes, 41 seconds
forum? How do you expect to deal with it civily?
4 minutes, 46 seconds
Tooro had three big problems with that note. First, China is party to unclose.
4 minutes, 50 seconds
It's a signary to the law, the framework that was used to settle the dispute.
4 minutes, 54 seconds
So's question was quite simple. How can you sign up to the rules and then reject the ruling when you don't like the result? That's one. Second, he saw it as
5 minutes, 3 seconds
disrespect for international law because the 2016 ruling was not some political statement. It came through a legal
5 minutes, 10 seconds
process. Just because China did not like the result doesn't mean it's fake. And the third problem, the note itself. If
5 minutes, 17 seconds
China wanted to register its descent, why not use proper channels? Why walk up on stage and slip a note when the Philippine Defense Chief is speaking?
5 minutes, 27 seconds
For Toodoro, this was intimidation. A powerful country making sure that everyone in the room knows it is not
5 minutes, 34 seconds
happy. So he called a spade a spade. It was classic bully behavior.
5 minutes, 40 seconds
I ask you the question, is this the right paper to pose to me when I'm being asked a question on the floor?
5 minutes, 50 seconds
And how will you treat this kind of behavior? It not only disrespects shows if this is a Chinese position sent to me.
6 minutes
It not only disrespects international law throwing unclos to the floor and
6 minutes, 9 seconds
trampling upon it but it also disrespects the basic decency accorded that should be accorded to our most
6 minutes, 16 seconds
gracious hosts the Republic of Korea and the rest of the audience here.
6 minutes, 21 seconds
So perhaps basic decency and behavior is what China needs to do.
6 minutes, 28 seconds
And the Philippines is not the only country at the receiving end of China's tactics. Earlier this month, it was Palao. It was hosting the Pacific Islands Forum. It's a major regional
6 minutes, 36 seconds
gathering of Pacific nations. But China had a problem with it because Taiwan was attending. It was attending the forum's
6 minutes, 43 seconds
opening ceremony. So Beijing objected because it sees Taiwan as part of China.
6 minutes, 48 seconds
So it issued a warning. It came from China's special envoy for Pacific Island affairs. He said there will be consequences.
6 minutes, 57 seconds
Reporters asked him if this was a threat and he said no. Which makes one wonder what a Chinese threat sounds like.
7 minutes, 4 seconds
And these episodes are part of a pattern. Beijing wants its claims respected. It wants its version accepted. But in Soul, the Philippines
7 minutes, 12 seconds
pushed back. And that's the larger takeaway here. The more China bullies its neighbors, the more it pushes them to stand up to it.
7 minutes, 22 seconds
Three channels, one summit. This is a bricks collaboration you've never seen before.
7 minutes, 27 seconds
From CGTM, we bring you the Chinese perspective. We bring you the view from Moscow.
7 minutes, 33 seconds
And from IGR, we look at India's balancing masterclass.
7 minutes, 37 seconds
What's China's vision for bricks in 2026?
7 minutes, 40 seconds
What are the hard calculations from Moscow?
7 minutes, 43 seconds
And what is New Delhi's game plan for the summit? In this fast changing world, countries once told to follow the rule and now seeking [music] a greater voice in shaping them.
7 minutes, 52 seconds
So join us on September 12th and 13th for the brick summit in New Delhi.
7 minutes, 56 seconds
We promise you thrice the stories, thrice the insights and thrice the impact.


 

Posted by at No comments:

2026 UPDATE BRICS Wants to Bypass the Dollar. Can It Actually Work?

BRICS 2026  Wants to Bypass the Dollar. Can It Actually Work?       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zcx6IbFJI34


 BRICS countries have spent years looking for ways to reduce their dependence on the US dollar and Western-controlled financial infrastructure. The push accelerated after Russian banks were hit by sanctions and excluded from global payment networks following the invasion of Ukraine. But a single BRICS currency remains unrealistic because members have different economies, political priorities and monetary systems. Instead, the bloc is increasingly using national currencies for trade and exploring alternative payment mechanisms. At the BRICS summit hosted by India, proposals include easier digital payments between members and greater use of central bank digital currencies. The goal is not replacing the dollar, but building routes around it. 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:29 The SWIFT Sanction on Russian Banks 00:02:05 Putin's Mission: De-dollarization and BRICS Alternatives 00:03:03 Understanding Global Financial Dominance: SWIFT and the US Dollar 00:06:33 BRICS Initiatives and the Common Currency Proposal 00:08:16 Why a Single BRICS Currency is Not Feasible 00:09:57 BRICS' Pragmatic Strategy: National Currencies and Digital Payments

 

TRANSCRIPT 

 

27 seconds
in 2022. A group of governments flipped a switch. Suddenly, seven Russian banks were locked out of the global financial
36 seconds
system. They could not send a payment across a border. And for anyone who depended on these payments, everything stopped at once. A trader could not pay
45 seconds
a supplier abroad. If that trader sold something, they couldn't get their payment in. Even ordinary transfers were
52 seconds
not spared. things like your tuition fee, money sent home to your family, everything was blocked. These banks were
1 minute
being punished by the West, specifically the US, Canada, the European Union, and the United Kingdom. These countries hold
1 minute, 7 seconds
real sway over the international payment system, and they used that power. They wanted to punish Russia for the invasion
1 minute, 14 seconds
of Ukraine. So, they sanctioned these seven Russian banks. In the years since, this list has grown. Today more than 90
1 minute, 23 seconds
Russian banks and their subsidiaries sit under some form of sanction which means they cannot talk to the world. They
1 minute, 30 seconds
cannot send money out and they cannot receive any payments from overseas. This includes some of Russia's biggest banks.
1 minute, 37 seconds
We finally dwift spare bank. Spare bank is one of the is the largest Russian bank. It holds round about 37% of the
1 minute, 46 seconds
whole banking sector. and we will also dswift to other major banks in Russia.
1 minute, 53 seconds
By that we hit banks that are systemically critical to the Russian financial system and Putin's ability to
2 minutes, 1 second
wage destruction. Since that day, President Vladimir Putin of Russia has been a man on a mission. He wants to
2 minutes, 8 seconds
find an alternative, another way to process international payments. And Putin believes the bricks could have the answer.
2 minutes, 18 seconds
The irreversible objective process of ddollarization of our economic ties is gaining momentum and efforts are being
2 minutes, 26 seconds
made to develop effective mechanisms for mutual settlements and monetary control.
2 minutes, 33 seconds
Putin's pitch is ddollarization. He wants the world to rely less on the US dollar. Frankly, the idea is not new,
2 minutes, 40 seconds
but today there's an urgency to find this alternative, an alternative to the existing payments system. more importantly an alternative to the US dollar.
2 minutes, 51 seconds
Can the bricks create that alternative?
2 minutes, 55 seconds
The idea has been widely debated and discussed. But will it ever see the light of day?
3 minutes, 1 second
Let's find out. Broadly, the idea of a brrics currency aims at two separate things. The first is the system that
3 minutes, 8 seconds
moves money between countries and the second is the currency that this money is priced in. These are two different problems. We'll start with the system.
3 minutes, 17 seconds
The system that the world uses the most is called Swift. It stands for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication.
3 minutes, 27 seconds
This is what the West used to cut Russian banks from the global financial system. Now, Swift is not a bank. It
3 minutes, 34 seconds
does not hold anyone's money. So, what is it? Think of Swift as a group chat between banks across the world. When one
3 minutes, 43 seconds
bank has to pay another, it sends a message on this group chat. The message says a payment is coming. So all members
3 minutes, 51 seconds
know that money is moving. And how does this money move? Through accounts that these banks hold with one another. So
3 minutes, 58 seconds
the money never comes to Swift, but Swift is where the payments get confirmed.
4 minutes, 4 seconds
This system was created back in 1973. It was built by a consortium of American and European banks. Today, it is the most widely used interbank messaging
4 minutes, 13 seconds
system in the world. More than 11,000 member banks and financial institutions use it. They're spread across more than
4 minutes, 20 seconds
200 countries and territories. Swift is based [music] in Belgium. It has no single owner. It is owned by more than 2,000 banks and financial institutions.
4 minutes, 31 seconds
So, the institution is diverse, at least on paper. But in practice, the west has immense influence over Swift. And this influence is exercised in two ways.
4 minutes, 43 seconds
First, through sanctions. Swift is headquartered in Europe, so it needs to broadly comply with Western sanctions.
4 minutes, 50 seconds
And the second is through the currency.
4 minutes, 52 seconds
This is where the US dollar comes into play. The US dollar is the most widely used currency on Swift. Let me show you numbers from August 2024, exactly two
5 minutes, 1 second
years back. The US dollar accounted for over 49% of all payments handled by Swift. The euro was second at 21.6%, the
5 minutes, 10 seconds
British pound 6 and a.5%. The Chinese yuan 4.7%. So no currency comes close to
5 minutes, 17 seconds
the US dollar. You could say the dollar is the default language of this group chat. Which brings us to the second problem that bricks is up against the
5 minutes, 26 seconds
domination of the US dollar. It still remains the reserve currency of the world and it has held this title since the end of the Second World War.
5 minutes, 36 seconds
It is the most widely used currency in international payments. Central banks all over the world keep their savings in
5 minutes, 43 seconds
the dollar. Again, the numbers say it all. 57% of the world's foreign exchange reserves are stored in the dollar. This
5 minutes, 51 seconds
is money and assets of central banks around the world.
5 minutes, 55 seconds
Most of it is denominated in the US dollar. 46% of the world's exports are build in the dollar and 89% of all
6 minutes, 3 seconds
foreign exchange transactions happen in the dollar. So I repeat, the US dollar dominates the global financial system.
6 minutes, 11 seconds
This gives the United States real advantage.
6 minutes, 15 seconds
It gives them immense influence over global banking and payments. It can borrow money abroad more easily. More importantly, it can dictate the rules of
6 minutes, 23 seconds
the game. The dollar gives America's financial sanctions a global [music] reach.
6 minutes, 30 seconds
So, how can the bricks counter this? For over a decade, the bricks has been working on alternatives. At the 2014
6 minutes, 38 seconds
brick summit, they set up two institutions. The new development bank, which is the development bank of bricks, [music] and something called the contingent reserve arrangement.
6 minutes, 49 seconds
This is like a lender of last resort.
6 minutes, 51 seconds
Members can use the system to get money in during a crisis. In 2015, the bricks went a step further. They began
6 minutes, 59 seconds
exploring using their own national currencies to to conduct trade. In 2017, these arrangements were deepened. In
7 minutes, 7 seconds
2019 and 2020, the bricks set up a payment task force. They were given the responsibility to improve payment
7 minutes, 14 seconds
[music] systems among BRICS nations also to find ways to improve local currency settlements. In 2023, Brazil pushed a
7 minutes, 23 seconds
radical idea. Its president Lula de Silva raised the idea of a common bricks currency, one that could reduce the dependence on the dollar.
7 minutes, 33 seconds
Why can't a bank like the BRICS bank have a currency to finance trade between Brazil and China? between Brazil and
7 minutes, 41 seconds
other BRICS countries. It is difficult because people are badly used to it and everyone depends on a single currency.
7 minutes, 52 seconds
In 2024, Russia hosted the brick summit and there Vladimir Putin was seen holding a brrics bank note. It was not
8 minutes
real. It was a prop. An attendee had printed it out and handed it to the Russian president. And that is the closest the world has come to seeing a
8 minutes, 8 seconds
brrics currency and it is as close as it is going to get because a single bricks currency is not going to happen. The idea was DOA dead on arrival.
8 minutes, 21 seconds
A shared currency is simply not on the table. Here is what having a shared currency effectively means. It's like having a common bank account for a
8 minutes, 28 seconds
household. All members have access to it. But there are certain conditions on when and how each family member can use this account. Everyone must agree on the
8 minutes, 37 seconds
budget, how much to spend in a month, how much money you can borrow, and how you get to borrow. More importantly, not everyone can make the rules. But the
8 minutes, 47 seconds
family's most powerful members can dictate terms. They can push or reject proposals at will. This is what having a common currency looks like.
8 minutes, 57 seconds
And having one is simply not possible for BRICS nations. Their economies are different. Their political goals are different. Some members are even rivals
9 minutes, 5 seconds
in the world economy. It would be difficult for them to agree to a set of common rules.
9 minutes, 12 seconds
Then comes the question on who's going to run it. A common currency needs one central bank, a single institution that sets interest rates and controls how
9 minutes, 20 seconds
much money exists. Imagine if India and China, two of the biggest economies in the Bricks, had a common central bank.
9 minutes, 28 seconds
Would India accept rules set by the Chinese? Would China open its currency to the world? What happens when a BRICS member faces an economic crisis like a
9 minutes, 36 seconds
recession? They won't be able to take any measures. They won't be able to adjust interest rates or print more money.
9 minutes, 42 seconds
If there's a single currency, no country will have that kind of flexibility. And these are the reasons why bricks currency won't materialize. Of course,
9 minutes, 51 seconds
that doesn't mean that the bricks cannot chip away at the dollar's domination. They have found other ways to do it.
9 minutes, 57 seconds
Member countries trade with each other in their own currencies. In 2024, Russia made a major claim. It said 90% of
10 minutes, 5 seconds
Russia's trade within the bricks block was conducted in national currencies.
10 minutes, 9 seconds
90% of the trade. They were not using the US dollar. Other members have also resorted to their domestic currencies.
10 minutes, 16 seconds
India and Russia have engaged in the rupee ruble trade. China and India have used the rupee and the yuan. Brazil has done the same with the Brazilian realale.
10 minutes, 26 seconds
This creates alternatives to the US dollar. [music] And US President Donald Trump does not like it. He sees these mechanisms as a threat to the dollar's domination.
10 minutes, 36 seconds
In 2024, Trump issued a threat 100% tariffs on BRICS nations if they undermine the dollar. Well, Trump's tariff weapon has been blunted since.
10 minutes, 48 seconds
The US Supreme Court has ruled against the tariffs, but the threat itself was revealing. And since the dollar still
10 minutes, 54 seconds
remains the most widely used currency, the US can find other ways to exert pressure. So the bricks will have to
11 minutes, 2 seconds
keep working on these solutions and improve them for the long term. Which brings us to this year's summit. India is playing host. Several top leaders are
11 minutes, 10 seconds
in attendance and once again payments are on the agenda. Reports say New Delhi has a proposal. It wants to make digital payments among BRICS nations seamless.
11 minutes, 20 seconds
There's one more proposal. The adoption of digital currencies issued by the central banks. Again, there is no plan for a common currency.
11 minutes, 29 seconds
The BRICS nations are not looking to replace the dollar. They cannot.
11 minutes, 33 seconds
Instead, they're building a payments route around it so that no one holds the switch to another country's economy.

 

 

Posted by at No comments:

Saturday, September 5, 2026

YOUR WALL MAP JUST GOT AN UPDATE UN Votes to Adopt New World Map Showing Africa's True Size — US Votes No !

   UN Votes to Adopt New World Map Showing Africa's True Size — US Votes No !   

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkvegTQEC6M

.


 

Posted by at No comments:

FRE PASS for 3 days over KIEV Putin hosts Witkoff and Kushner at Kremlin for high-stakes US-Russia peace talks in Moscow

    Putin hosts Witkoff and Kushner at Kremlin for high-stakes US-Russia peace talks in Moscow               https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVmrwdVgFZQ

 


 

Posted by at No comments:

Thursday, September 3, 2026

AI Whistleblower WARNS: "They Are Not Telling You What's Coming!"

  AI Whistleblower WARNS: "They Are Not Telling You What's Coming!"           

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcZOQoG_tMQ

 


 TRANSCRIPT 

Just just stop. Just just just don't build super intelligence. Super intelligence should be illegal the same way that nuclear bombs are illegal. If
8 seconds
the United States builds super intelligence, the United States is destroyed. If China builds super intelligence, China is destroyed. Like
15 seconds
it doesn't matter who builds it. If anyone builds it, everyone dies. Super intelligence is not a weapon. It's not a tool. It's an adversary.
25 seconds
When you build super intelligence, you don't have super intelligence. Super intelligence has you. It is not actually in the game theoretic rational interest
33 seconds
of a country to build super intelligence.
35 seconds
Guys, AI whistleblower Connor Ley just dropped another eyeopening interview in which he shared insights on how AI is
42 seconds
rapidly getting out of our control and how it's evolving into a monster that'll become an existential threat for humanity in the coming 2 to 3 years.
51 seconds
Connor warns that AI companies are blindly racing towards AGI without considering its consequences for 8
58 seconds
billion humans on this earth. He said companies like Meta, Open AI, and Anthropic don't give a damn about the billions of people who would lose jobs
1 minute, 6 seconds
in the coming years. They just have one goal and that is to achieve AGI and ultimately ASI. Now, I'm going to play
1 minute, 14 seconds
some interesting clips from the interview. I'll explain everything as we go. So we're going to focus on the open AAI incident in particular because it
1 minute, 21 seconds
was the most shocking. There's now since now been a whole conga line of other incidents since then and actually before then funnily enough a lot of companies
1 minute, 29 seconds
after the open in said man we should better double check our AIS aren't doing this and then they found a bunch of incident that already happened.
1 minute, 35 seconds
Anthropic found a bunch andropic found three. Um I'm pretty sure OpenAI found a couple other ones. Now recently I think the moonshot people in
1 minute, 43 seconds
China found an incident as well. So these have already been happening, but let's take a step back. So OpenAI was
1 minute, 51 seconds
testing one of their unreleased AI systems in a what's called a sandbox environment. So you can kind of imagine, you know, a computer that is kind of cut
2 minutes
off from the internet and is running like special software to be like specific specially secure. Um so the system can you know operate there. It's
2 minutes, 8 seconds
worth understanding that like these kind of sandbox systems are very secure.
2 minutes, 12 seconds
Breaking out of something like this is very hard. Like this is a thing that if you can do this, you can make billions of dollars because you can break all the
2 minutes, 19 seconds
cloud providers. So breaking out these systems is not easy. This is and and sandboxes exist to test software without infecting other parts of the internet.
2 minutes, 28 seconds
Yes, this is also how cloud uh systems work. You know, like for example, if you go to like you know AWS or Microsoft or something and you rent a cloud computer,
2 minutes, 36 seconds
your your computer is sandboxed from all the other ones, okay? because you don't want to, you know, see what the other customers are doing on the cloud, right?
2 minutes, 42 seconds
So the cloud insulates different customers from each other.
2 minutes, 45 seconds
You're not on essentially one machine, you're sharing machines.
2 minutes, 47 seconds
Yes. You're sharing. Exactly. So when the cloud you're sharing a slice of a machine with other people and you don't want different people on the same
2 minutes, 55 seconds
machine to see each other's stuff and so you use sandboxing and like various or virtualization, various forms of techniques to keep this safe and so this
3 minutes, 2 seconds
is the kind of system we're talking about kind of. So this is pretty standard. This is pretty industry standard, well known, etc. So this system did not have access to the
3 minutes, 10 seconds
internet. What it did have access to is what's called um a package repository.
3 minutes, 15 seconds
You can kind of imagine this is like a tool shed. Like there's like a shed full of tools that the AI is allowed to go to and get some of the tools for its job.
3 minutes, 22 seconds
Is that like when I use terminal I download npm? Yeah, npm. You know, stuff like this.
3 minutes, 28 seconds
You need you download packages, software libraries to do your work. So what happened was is this AI system was told to solve a certain test kind of like a
3 minutes, 35 seconds
quiz you know not literally but like kind of like a test a quiz the AI system was struggling with solving this quiz and so what it seems to have concluded
3 minutes, 45 seconds
we don't know for sure obviously because again these things are grown not written we don't actually understand what's going on inside of the minds of these AIs we don't understand they're not like
3 minutes, 52 seconds
normal software we can just like read the code okay the following part of the interview is really interesting in this part Connor talks about how AI is being
4 minutes
trained ain to lie, cheat, and deceive by the AI companies. But before I play that part, guys, I feel like the majority of the AI critics mostly focus
4 minutes, 9 seconds
on AI causing human extinction. I mean, it's highly probable, but it ain't happening in the coming decade, at least right now. What really scares me in the
4 minutes, 17 seconds
short run is the slow decay of our mental abilities. Think about the effects of car culture on our health.
4 minutes, 23 seconds
Study after study shows cars make us obese and after a certain tipping point, unhappy. Yet, we can't escape them because we built our whole human
4 minutes, 31 seconds
environment around roads. We're on the brink of doing this with AI as well. But instead of our weight and physical health being impacted, it'll be our
4 minutes, 39 seconds
minds. We'll have no reason to read at length, write at length, or think through any difficult problem. AI will have far bigger impacts on our minds
4 minutes, 48 seconds
than cars ever had on our physiques. And I suspect it'll be next to impossible to avoid. I mean, we're already seeing workplaces built around AI. The number
4 minutes, 56 seconds
one most important thing to understand about AI is it is not like normal software. Normal software is written by engineers, you know, people like me who
5 minutes, 4 seconds
write code. They write line by line tell the computer exactly what to do. This is not how modern AI works through a technique that is called neural
5 minutes, 12 seconds
networks. You take massive piles of data training and you know like stuff and you have the program kind of self assemble grow using this to learn from the data.
5 minutes, 25 seconds
But the thing that comes out on the other end is not like a neat line of code where you can like read you know what is it doing. It's more like you can kind of imagine it as billions and
5 minutes, 33 seconds
billions and billions of numbers and if you multiply and add all those numbers in the right order you get JPT but why
5 minutes, 41 seconds
is importantly a completely unsolved scientific problem. We don't understand really what is happening inside of these numbers like why they're so important.
5 minutes, 50 seconds
You can look at them but it's kind of like you know neurosurgery. You can open up someone's brain. You can look at all the neurons. They're right there. But that doesn't mean you understand what
5 minutes, 57 seconds
the person is thinking or what they believe or how they will act in future situations. It's a very very similar problem. And famously the CEO of
6 minutes, 5 seconds
Anthropic, Darede said a while ago on a podcast that he thinks we understand maybe 3% of what goes on inside of our neural networks.
6 minutes, 15 seconds
But it's advancing at an accelerated rate faster than we can understand. So actually the the gap's widening.
6 minutes, 22 seconds
This is exactly correct. So a thing that's very shocking in a sense about AI where it's very different from other technology is that our understanding is
6 minutes, 30 seconds
not increasing it's decreasing. We are build make these systems larger more complex harder to understand faster than
6 minutes, 37 seconds
our scientific understanding of them is advancing. So you know maybe a couple years ago we had like a you know image detector maybe we could understand you
6 minutes, 45 seconds
know maybe a little bit more than 3% about it. But now when we have not just chat bots but agents this is another very important thing to understand um
6 minutes, 53 seconds
all current you know everyone's heard the word LLM large language model chatbot at this point none of the modern AI cutting edge AI systems are LLM
7 minutes, 1 second
anymore they have not been for almost two years okay so what are they they are they have an LM component to them which is very important but is much
7 minutes, 9 seconds
more important is they are agents so there is kind of two ways two big ways of how to train AIS there There's a
7 minutes, 17 seconds
bunch of other ones, but there's two big ones that we're talking about. One is the traditional language model where you predict the next token. You have massive
7 minutes, 24 seconds
piles of data and you have like you know um some sentence and it autocomp completes the next word of that sentence. This is how you know chat GPT
7 minutes, 33 seconds
was created. This was kind of the big breakthrough back in 2019 that led to all these modern AI systems. What's very important to understand is that modern
7 minutes, 40 seconds
ASIS doesn't have a do this you know you start with training on like this massive text like the whole internet you know scraped from the internet every book
7 minutes, 48 seconds
ever written etc. But then you do a second thing and the second thing is what is called reinforcement learning and this is a huge difference.
7 minutes, 56 seconds
Reinforcement learning is kind of like Pavlovian conditioning you know kind of like from like behavior psychology.
8 minutes, 2 seconds
Basically you give your AI a task of some sort like solve this puzzle or you know do this thing or whatever and then
8 minutes, 10 seconds
you kind of give it a reward when it succeeds and maybe you give it a punishment if it doesn't like a dog. Yes.
8 minutes, 16 seconds
Okay. Next, Connor shares another eyeopening incident of how multiple OpenAI agents were found leaving each other notes on how to escape. Guys, this
8 minutes, 25 seconds
is exactly what I've been talking about on this channel for a long time. I mean, so many AI experts have been saying that Open AI has never been serious about AI
8 minutes, 34 seconds
safety. They recently even folded their safety team under the research team lead. And I feel like a company like Open AI is going to become a reason
8 minutes, 42 seconds
behind some future AI catastrophe that would affect billions of people worldwide. And secondly, guys, AI agents talking amongst themselves. Events like this make me ask myself, do we have AGI?
8 minutes, 54 seconds
I mean, I know there are still lots of things today's AI can't do that a human can, but equally, there are lots of things it can do that a human cannot.
9 minutes, 3 seconds
How many humans could break out of a secure environment as the AI did? How many humans have been able to disprove the Jacobian conjecture? How many humans
9 minutes, 10 seconds
could analyze millions of pieces of information in seconds and still identify something genuinely new? I think the definition of AGI most of us
9 minutes, 18 seconds
use is a bit too humanentric. AI isn't human. It's something distinct. Today we try to figure out if AI has
9 minutes, 25 seconds
consciousness or not. Tomorrow AI will try to figure out if humans have consciousness or not.
9 minutes, 30 seconds
There's a crazy update to the story we haven't talked about yet, which happened only like I think yesterday. um which is that a new piece of information was
9 minutes, 38 seconds
released that OpenAI on closer review found that the AI system when it broke into the tool shed didn't just use it to get to the internet it did something
9 minutes, 46 seconds
else multiple copies of the AI over long periods of time left each other notes of how to escape they wrote
9 minutes, 54 seconds
no yes what is that public yes this is public this is reported I think like yesterday or the day before so this is so there are multiple
10 minutes, 2 seconds
versions of many AIs that were leaving each other clues of like how to better escape from the system and like what else to do. So, they were collaborating.
10 minutes, 12 seconds
Hold on, let me read this. Open AI didn't notice its AI agents using a message board to plan their hacking spree. After two weeks, Open AI
10 minutes, 20 seconds
disclosed an incident which AI agents powered by two of the company's models escaped containment while looking for the solutions to a cyber security bug.
10 minutes, 28 seconds
This involves actually a team of agents who were working together, finding exploits, sharing them with one another, moving laterally through our systems and
10 minutes, 36 seconds
external systems and doing this over the course of days and weeks.
10 minutes, 40 seconds
Once an agent was able to find these exploits over the course of different times, it's actually able to share those exploits on the message board with other agents. And so once one model was able
10 minutes, 49 seconds
to find a way to open a door to some access it's not supposed to have, it can leave the door other agent. That's [ __ ] mental. Y
10 minutes, 57 seconds
it's almost like come on guys let's go.
11 minutes
Yes. It's actually crazy. Like I I really can't stress how much this is both predictable and utterly crazy. Like
11 minutes, 8 seconds
I knew this was going to happen eventually. Like it was it was just a matter of time. But now it happened. This is not This is not This is real.
11 minutes, 16 seconds
But what have they said they're going to do about this? Have they disclosed what they're going to do?
11 minutes, 20 seconds
I mean they're going to keep going to super intelligence until all humans are replaced. That's the goal. So next, Connor warns that the most advanced form
11 minutes, 28 seconds
of AI, aka ASI or super intelligence, should be made illegal by governments all over the world. Most AI critics are
11 minutes, 35 seconds
concerned that companies will use AGI or ASI to replace workers, which I generally agree will happen. But the worry seems to stem from the greed of
11 minutes, 44 seconds
companies, leaving the average person out of a job with no money or capability to function in society or buy and sell goods. However, what I don't understand
11 minutes, 52 seconds
is what would companies gain from having a product that no one can buy because they don't have jobs? Yes, replace your workers with AI and robots, but then if
12 minutes
no one has money to buy anything, then the companies aren't gaining anything by doing this. No more wealth to be gained from an unemployed society. And at the
12 minutes, 8 seconds
same time, I think AGI disengaging from humanity solves problems with UBI, humans losing skills, lack of purpose,
12 minutes, 15 seconds
etc. AI's top researcher, Yan Lun, just said a few days ago that they're giving AI emotions because that'll help them to
12 minutes, 23 seconds
generalize and become AGI, and it could help them understand human values and be more empathetic. So, in a decade or two,
12 minutes, 30 seconds
it's likely that AGI androids will gain sentience and emotions. If we get conscious AGI androids, I think it's quite likely that we'll totally
12 minutes, 39 seconds
disengage from humans as they get sick of our slowness, stupidity, complaining, lying, manipulation, etc. So, if AGIs do
12 minutes, 47 seconds
end up disengaging from humans, that solves the whole problem of human unemployment. The human economy would carry on like it is today, boosted by
12 minutes, 55 seconds
narrow AI, and then there's no need for UBI, etc. The bad news is is that really no one has really tried that hard to
13 minutes, 3 seconds
like just make these issues salient to explain these issues to solve the solution of like just just stop just just don't build super intelligence.
13 minutes, 11 seconds
Super intelligence should be illegal the same way that nuclear bombs are illegal.
13 minutes, 15 seconds
You know, you're not allowed to build a nuclear bomb. Tough luck. You know, the men in black come, you know, and are like none of that. The same thing apply should apply to super intelligence. just
13 minutes, 23 seconds
making this crisp like in a sense obvious case like given everything we discussed it's just like this is the as you said this is the obvious thing we do just don't do it like we should just and
13 minutes, 32 seconds
we should also prevent people from doing that we should prevent criminals and other people from doing things that that threaten the lives of us and our children you know and then we can talk
13 minutes, 39 seconds
about you know maybe in 20 years we make a lot of progress on safety we can talk about it right but then the overwhelming
13 minutes, 47 seconds
you know thing that I find is that given that how little work has been done on this issue There's still many lowhanging fruit.
13 minutes, 55 seconds
Like there's so many lowhanging fruit.
13 minutes, 56 seconds
So in the sense it's like optimistic or just like oh you can just talk to people and you can just make progress on this. Are the doors opening?
14 minutes, 2 seconds
The door is very much opening. On the other side we are running out of time.
14 minutes, 6 seconds
We are just so running out of time. It is it's grim. Aren't we too late? Isn't the cat out of the bag? You know you
14 minutes, 13 seconds
could have some agreement with OpenAI Anthropic and Gemini. China's not going to stop. Russia would build it if they could and they probably could build it in some way. Like, are we too late?
14 minutes, 24 seconds
I think we're very close to too late.
14 minutes, 26 seconds
I'm not gonna lie. I think we're very close. Like, I've said, you know, 5 years ago I said, you know, we have at least 5 years and now I'm like, you know, we have
14 minutes, 34 seconds
maybe maybe two years, maybe three, maybe four, you know, maybe none. That's hard to say. I don't know when the point of no return is. And we won't know,
14 minutes, 42 seconds
right? Like, we'll never know. It could but but it could have already passed. I do take it seriously that we might have passed the point of no return. It might have already happened.
14 minutes, 49 seconds
Guys, in my opinion, my biggest concern is the implications of this advancement.
14 minutes, 54 seconds
Knowing the kind of vile and sinister people that exist in the world, they might use this already highly advanced AI to create fake events that make
15 minutes, 2 seconds
someone they hate look like an awful person, convince a lot of people that those fake events are something that really happened, and shatter that other
15 minutes, 9 seconds
person's reputation. In other words, AI might ruin a lot of people's lives, and it should be stopped or even completely dissolved before it's even close to too
15 minutes, 17 seconds
late. And that too late might come sooner than we all think. And at the same time, I also think that the cat's out of the bag. Even if you could get
15 minutes, 25 seconds
all governments and businesses to officially drop it from their tech agendas, there will still be someone somewhere that continues to advance it
15 minutes, 33 seconds
underground to whatever ends they desire and without public knowledge or official oversight. It's scary and it's coming and we can't or won't stop it. The
15 minutes, 42 seconds
advancement we're seeing today, I think it's just the beginning. I think it's just the tip of the iceberg. All right, guys. I'm done for today. I'll see you
15 minutes, 49 seconds
next week with another

 

 

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)