What US Secretary of State Marco Rubio Said In Brussels Is An Eye Openin...

Bloggers note:  Finish are the days that Governments spend 100 Millions $$ to NGOs for a recipient to get 10 Million $$ ..

What US Secretary of State Marco Rubio Said In Brussels Is An Eye Opening Reality— A New World Order

..

no no their econ No no no no no no their

0:02

economies are not crashing their markets

0:03

are reacting no their economies are not

0:05

crashing their markets are reacting to a

0:08

dramatic change in the global order in

0:10

terms of trade and so what happens is

0:12

pretty straightforward if you're a

0:13

company and you make a bunch of your

0:15

products in China and all of a sudden

0:18

shareholders or people that play the

0:19

stock market realize that it's going to

0:21

cost a lot more to produce in China your

0:23

stock is going to go down but ultimately

0:25

the markets as long as as long as they

0:27

know what the the rules are going to be

0:28

moving forward and as long as that's set

0:30

in and you can sustain where you're

0:32

going to be the markets will adjust

0:34

businesses around the world including in

0:36

trade and global trade they just need to

0:37

know what the rules are once they know

0:39

what the rules are they will adjust to

0:40

those rules so I I don't think it's fair

0:43

to say economies are crashing markets

0:44

are crashing because markets are based

0:46

on the stock value of companies who

0:48

today are embedded in modes of

0:50

production that are bad for the United

0:51

States we have to be a country that

0:53

think we're the largest consumer market

0:54

in the world and yet the only thing we

0:56

export is services and we need to stop

0:58

that we need to get back to a time of

1:00

worry country that can make things and

1:01

to do that we have to reset the global

1:03

order of trade term and the other part

1:04

of my question well the worst thing is

1:06

to leave it the way it is forever i mean

1:08

this is just can't continue we can't

1:09

continue to be a country that doesn't

1:11

make things we have to be able to make

1:12

things to provide jobs for Americans we

1:15

and that that's it it's that simple

1:17

china as an example i mean it's it's

1:19

outrageous i mean they don't consume

1:20

anything all they do is export and flood

1:22

and and distort markets in addition to

1:24

all the tariffs and barriers they put in

1:26

place so the president rightly has

1:28

concluded that the current status of

1:31

global trade is bad for America and good

1:33

for a bunch of other people and he's

1:34

going to reset it and he's absolutely

1:35

right to do it ask you about also the

1:38

predictability of relationships with

1:40

allies the prime minister of Greenland

1:44

excuse me the prime minister of Denmark

1:47

which at this point owns Greenland so

1:50

Denmark a NATO ally is saying that it's

1:52

unacceptable that one country cannot

1:55

annex another country born no one's

1:58

annexed anything it's going to be up to

1:59

Greenlanders the vice president made

2:00

that clear he's going to respect the

2:02

self-determination of Greenlanders so at

2:05

some point the Greenlanders have made

2:07

clear that they want to be independent

2:08

of Denmark so that's the Greenland

2:10

Denmark should focus on the fact that

2:11

the Greenlanders don't want to be a part

2:13

of Denmark that's what they should focus

2:14

on we didn't give them that idea they've

2:16

been talking about that for a long time

2:18

whenever they make that decision they'll

2:20

make that decision and then the what

2:21

what we're not going to do is let China

2:23

come in now and and say offer them a

2:25

bunch of money and become you know

2:26

dependent on China the president said he

2:28

would not rule out using military force

2:30

against Denmark a NATO ally no he said

2:33

he would not rule out No no no he said

2:34

he would not rule out he said I'm not

2:36

going to rule out anything if Den if

2:37

Greenland is encroached upon by a

2:40

foreign power like a China or Russia or

2:42

anybody else but it doesn't matter

2:43

because Greenlanders are going to make a

2:45

decision they're the ones that want to

2:47

get away from Denmark they're the ones

2:48

that want to be independent and not us

2:51

we didn't come up with that idea they

2:52

did and if they make that decision then

2:54

the United States would stand ready

2:55

potentially to step in and say "Okay we

2:57

can create a partnership with you."

2:58

We're not at that stage but that's what

3:00

the vice president made clear last week

3:01

in his visit there his statement was

3:03

very abundantly clear that we will

3:05

respect the self-determination of the

3:06

people of Greenland the people of

3:08

Greenland and they're the ones that want

3:09

to leave Denmark that wasn't our idea

3:11

all right well second question here

3:12

missy from uh Washington Post mr

3:15

secretary I'd like to ask you about the

3:16

Russia Ukraine negotiations can you give

3:19

us um the your tell us about the

3:22

American assessment of the conditions

3:23

that Russia put forward um following the

3:26

regarding the Black Sea ceasefire talks

3:29

and also the British and French foreign

3:31

minister said this morning that Putin

3:33

was dragging his feet do you agree with

3:36

that that maybe he might be we don't

3:38

know yet we're going to find out fairly

3:39

soon i mean look we are here's what the

3:41

president wanted to do he wants to end

3:43

this war and he wanted to test it very

3:45

early in his administration is it

3:46

possible to end this war on terms that

3:48

are acceptable obviously to both sides

3:50

because you can't end a war unless both

3:51

sides agree and that's what we're in the

3:53

process of finding out we will know soon

3:55

enough in a matter of weeks not months

3:57

whether Russia is serious about peace or

3:59

not i hope they are it would be good for

4:00

the world if that war ended but

4:02

obviously we have to test that

4:03

proposition so we're working through

4:05

that process we had a visitor that Mr

4:07

carrill was here this week had a chance

4:09

to sit down with him he met with others

4:11

uh he'll take some messages back and the

4:13

message is the United States needs to

4:14

know whether you're serious or not about

4:16

peace ultimately Putin will have to make

4:18

that decision the Russian Federation

4:19

will have to make that decision uh I

4:21

think the Ukrainians have shown a

4:22

willingness to enter for example into a

4:24

complete ceasefire to create space for

4:27

uh negotiation at some point here fairly

4:30

soon not 6 months from now you know the

4:32

the Russian and Putin will have to make

4:35

a decision about whether they're serious

4:36

for peace or not and I hope they are

4:37

serious it would be good for the world

4:38

if that war ended what is your

4:40

assessment of the Russian conditions

4:41

that were put forward and also Demetri

4:43

have said following his talks with Mr

4:45

wickoff yesterday that the US and Russia

4:47

might resume direct flights as maybe a

4:50

confidence building measure do do you

4:51

support that well I haven't heard

4:53

anything about direct flights i can tell

4:54

you but I don't know who's going to fly

4:56

in because all these people are

4:57

sanctioned but I would just tell you

4:58

that um the the the thing I would point

5:00

to you is this i'm not we're going to

5:03

wait and see the Russians know our

5:05

position in terms of wanting to end the

5:06

war and we will know from their answers

5:08

very soon whether they are serious about

5:10

proceeding with real peace or whether

5:12

this is a delay tactic it's a delay

5:14

tactic the president's not interested in

5:15

that if this is dragging things out

5:18

Donald President Trump's not going to

5:19

fall into the trap of endless

5:20

negotiations about negotiations we won't

5:23

know soon enough whether or not Russia's

5:25

serious about peace if they are that'll

5:27

be great then we can move towards peace

5:28

if they're not then we'll have to

5:30

reevaluate where we stand and and what

5:32

we do moving forward about it but we'll

5:34

be in no different a position than we

5:35

are today or we were when he took office

5:37

he wanted to know early in his

5:39

administration is peace possible we're

5:41

testing to see if the Russians are

5:43

interested in peace their actions not

5:44

their words their actions will determine

5:46

whether they're serious or not and we

5:48

intend to find that out sooner rather

5:49

than later what about their conditions

5:51

which condition they put forward

5:53

additional conditions after you the

5:55

season yeah so again I mean this is part

5:57

of the the back and forth of these sorts

5:59

of things i've had phone calls with

6:01

foreign leaders and then I read the

6:02

readout and it's like oh we said them

6:03

you never they they came they said

6:06

something to me they never said I guess

6:07

that's part of the game in this place or

6:09

whatever but look I don't bottom line is

6:11

to me at the end of the day what's going

6:13

to matter here is whether we're going to

6:14

move towards peace or not if peace is

6:16

real we will know soon enough if they're

6:18

not interested in peace we will know

6:19

soon enough and we'll make decisions on

6:21

the basis I hope they are real there are

6:23

some promising signs there are some

6:24

troubling signs it's not going to be

6:26

easy no one ever said this would be easy

6:28

but we're going to find out sooner

6:30

rather than later and let's just say I'm

6:32

hopeful i remain hopeful i need to be

6:34

hopeful that peace is possible and that

6:36

the Russians are serious about peace we

6:38

want them to be serious about peace and

6:40

hopefully they are but we'll know sooner

6:42

rather than later daffany Reuters uh hi

6:44

sorry I'm back here your last name is

6:45

Reuters

6:48

oh it's pretty cool isn't it how you Go

6:50

ahead uh on the 5% defense spending

6:53

target have you received push back to

6:55

this idea while you've been here this

6:57

week and you mentioned yesterday up to

6:59

5% uh was your language what do you mean

7:01

by up to 5% well I said up to a path up

7:05

getting up to 5% at some point i'm not

7:06

saying overnight but to get to that

7:08

point we think that's what NATO allies

7:10

need to be spending for NATO to face the

7:12

threats that itself has identified and

7:14

articulated here's the good news the

7:16

good news is everyone generally with a

7:18

couple with a couple exceptions are

7:19

spending more on defense today than they

7:21

were three four five years ago that's

7:22

positive that trend needs to continue so

7:25

the trend lines are good but they need

7:26

to continue but this is not about

7:28

spending okay this is not about money

7:29

necessarily this is about capability in

7:32

order for NATO to be stronger it needs

7:35

partners that are stronger okay the

7:36

United States commits a lot to NATO and

7:38

continues to we are as involved in NATO

7:40

today as we have ever been and we intend

7:42

to continue to be but it has to be a

7:44

real alliance and that means that our

7:46

alliance partners have to increase their

7:47

own capabilities so hopefully two things

7:50

have led to that the first is the war in

7:51

Ukraine i think has woken up a lot of

7:53

people on the continent about real

7:55

threats and real war and the other is I

7:57

think the pressure and and the

7:58

statements of President Trump that have

8:00

been pretty consistent about increasing

8:02

their spending so this whole trajectory

8:04

of more defense spending began I believe

8:07

back in 2017 2018 under President

8:10

Trump's first term we want that trend to

8:12

continue and we're hoping when the

8:14

leaders meet in the HEG that there'll be

8:15

further and firmer commitments in that

8:17

direction i think it's beneficial to the

8:19

alliance the stronger our partners in

8:22

NATO are the more capable our partners

8:24

in NATO are the stronger NATO is and

8:26

everybody should be in favor of that and

8:28

sorry just to follow up so will you try

8:30

and get the official target as 5% rather

8:33

than 2% and will the US commit to 5%

8:36

sure we're heading there now we're going

8:37

to have to spend more on national

8:38

security because we have a global

8:39

footprint and that's the point that I

8:41

think's been made and missed uh in a lot

8:43

of places okay the United States has

8:45

Indo-Pacific alliance obligations as

8:47

well that we've made we are currently

8:49

involved in opening up the Red Sea so

8:51

that global shipping for everyone

8:53

including our European partners can

8:54

become possible again we're engaged in

8:57

counter drug and counter gang

8:58

interdictions in the Western Hemisphere

9:00

there's obviously all sorts of issues

9:02

going on in different parts of the world

9:04

including we're concerned about a

9:06

resurgence of terrorist cells whether

9:08

it's in Africa or in the Middle East so

9:10

the US has these global oblig

9:12

obligations and we have China that's

9:14

undergoing the largest most expansive

9:17

peacetime military expansion in history

9:20

so we need to confront all of these

9:21

things and we're engaged in all of those

9:23

things so we're going to have to

9:24

increase defense spending in our country

9:26

um I think our commitment to NATO isn't

9:28

just three and something percent

9:30

spending of GDP it's sustained over

9:32

extraordinary period of time and that

9:34

continues so um look I think our

9:37

partners know they need to do more

9:38

they've all indicated they want to do

9:40

more they've begun to do more and that

9:42

trend needs to continue mr secretary you

9:44

mentioned that you met with Puriel Dutri

9:46

as well in order to stop them from

9:48

dragging their feet and dragging this on

9:50

is there anything that you said perhaps

9:52

not threats but is there anything that

9:54

you said you wanted to see concretely

9:55

from the Russian side in order to peace

9:58

we want to see peace but specifics in

10:00

terms of getting to this ceasefire first

10:02

and then the negotiations yeah i mean

10:03

peace means you stop shooting at each

10:04

other i mean it's as simplistic as that

10:06

now obviously look there are all kinds

10:07

of conditions for a final peace and you

10:09

have to work with both sides and I've

10:10

said from the beginning the only way a

10:12

war ends in a negotiated settlement if

10:14

it's not an unconditional surrender then

10:16

it is both sides make concessions we're

10:18

not going to prejudge what those

10:19

concessions are because those

10:20

concessions will depend on what Ukraine

10:22

will accept and Russia will accept but

10:24

we have to make concrete steps towards

10:25

peace what we're not interested in and

10:27

I'm not accusing them of this I'm just

10:29

telling you what we're not interested in

10:30

is negotiations about negotiations that

10:33

we're not going to continue this forever

10:34

so none of it was threatening i think it

10:36

was more an explanation of this is our

10:38

timeline and at some point it'll be

10:40

clear whether you want peace or you

10:41

don't want peace and that time is coming

10:43

it's pretty short at the same time as we

10:45

now have seen members of Congress have

10:46

begun to file bills file bills to

10:49

increase sanctions so there is going to

10:51

be growing pressure from Capitol Hill to

10:52

impose sanctions that we're not going to

10:54

be able to stop if in fact we're not

10:56

making progress towards peace all these

10:58

factors have been explained in the

11:00

nicest way possible hopefully he'll take

11:02

that message back to Moscow and it'll

11:04

make clear that we need to begin to see

11:05

real progress or we'll have to conclude

11:07

that they're not interested in peace but

11:08

let's hope they are because I think it

11:09

would be better for everyone every

11:12

Well we need to hear an answer to this i

11:14

mean you talks are only we're going to

11:16

have talks as long as talks are about

11:18

something they can't be talks about

11:19

talks uh at the end you know uh I think

11:22

initially it was important to talk

11:23

because we hadn't talked to them in a

11:25

long time but now we've reached the

11:26

stage where we need to make make

11:28

progress and if we're not making

11:30

progress towards peace then we have a

11:32

set of factors that we have to take into

11:33

account but hopefully we are going to

11:35

make progress towards peace i remain

11:37

optimistic that we can it'll be hard

11:39

it'll be difficult but I'm optimistic

11:40

that we can mr secretary the the Myanmar

11:42

earthquake I mean normally in these kind

11:44

of events you would have up to 200

11:46

Americans with sniffer dogs special

11:48

equipment experts in their field saving

11:51

lives on the ground this has not

11:53

happened because of the dismantling of

11:55

US well that and the fact that it's run

11:57

by a military honta that doesn't like us

11:59

so it's hard for us to move around in

12:00

that country i say it's it's these

12:02

events are always non-political they

12:04

went into Syria for example in the

12:05

Turkey Syria earthquake so they can

12:07

access well we're not the government of

12:08

the world no we we'll provide

12:09

humanitarian assistance just like

12:11

everybody else does and we will do it

12:13

the best we can but we also have other

12:15

needs we have to balance that against

12:16

we're not walking away from humanitarian

12:18

assistance but again I go back there's a

12:20

lot of other rich countries in the world

12:21

they should all be pitching in we're

12:22

going to do our part we already have

12:24

people there we'll have more people

12:25

there we'll help as much as we can it's

12:27

not the easiest place to work okay they

12:29

have a military hunter that doesn't like

12:30

us doesn't necessarily allow us to

12:32

operate in that country the way we

12:33

wanted to that would have impeded our

12:35

response no matter what that said we are

12:37

willing to continue to help in the

12:38

humanitarian crisis other countries need

12:40

to do so as well china is a very rich

12:42

country india is a rich country there

12:44

are a lot of other countries in the

12:45

world and everyone should pitch in i

12:47

don't think it's fair to assume that the

12:48

United States needs to continue to share

12:50

the burden 60 70% of humanitarian aid

12:52

around the world we will be in the

12:54

business of humanitarian aid but we have

12:55

other priorities as well that are

12:57

national interest priorities of the

12:58

United States and we're going to align

13:00

all those to be properly balanced isn't

13:01

this a dimution of your soft power i

13:03

mean all of the experts in this have

13:05

said the reason is not because of the

13:07

politics of Myanmar but it's because of

13:09

the dismantling of US aid you simply

13:10

couldn't deploy yeah i don't listen to

13:12

these so-called experts there's not real

13:14

experts these are so-called experts

13:16

these are people that are part of that

13:17

NGO um industrial complex no no these

13:21

are people that made millions and

13:22

hundreds and millions of dollars in

13:24

these NOS's all over the world that

13:25

stand up and they get flooded with US

13:27

taxpayer money and then we have to spend

13:29

10 $100 million to get $10 million to

13:31

people we're not doing that anymore okay

13:33

we have stopped we are no longer going

13:35

to spend 10 million $100 million to get

13:38

$10 million to recipients we're not

13:40

going to fund these global NOS's all

13:42

over the world that are living off of

13:43

this we're not doing it we are prepared

13:45

to help and work with governments and

13:47

appropriate NOS's on the ground that are

13:48

are delivering assistance we will be

13:50

there and we will be helpful there are a

13:52

lot of other rich countries they should

13:53

also pitch in and help and some of them

13:55

are and some of them are not but we are

13:57

going to do our part we're going to

13:58

continue to do our part but it's going

14:00

to be balanced with all of the other

14:01

interests we have as a country we are

14:03

not a nation we are the richest country

14:05

in the world but our resources are not

14:07

unlimited they are not unlimited and we

14:09

have a massive national debt and we have

14:11

many other priorities as well and it's

14:13

time to recalibrate all of that so we'll

14:14

be there we'll be helpful as much as we

14:16

can we've got other things we have to

14:18

take care of as well but we care deeply

14:19

about what's happened there and we wish

14:21

we had a more cooperative government mr

14:23

secretary the Middle East was part of

14:25

your discussion here in NATO especially

14:27

that did you find uh support from

14:30

members toward your policy of air

14:32

strikes in the Houthis and your maximum

14:35

pressure policy toward Iran

14:38

yeah I mean on the Houthies everybody

14:39

wants to get their ships through the Red

14:40

Sea we're the only ones doing anything

14:42

about it but everyone wants to you know

14:44

get their ships through there as I said

14:46

we've done the world a great favor by

14:48

taking on this band of criminals who

14:50

have unfortunately sophisticated

14:51

weaponry that they can use to I mean

14:53

they've attacked what 150 160 merchant

14:56

vessels 174 times they've attacked the

14:59

United States Navy so I I think the

15:01

world should be grateful to the United

15:03

States for being involved in this and

15:04

doing this everyone thanks us for it um

15:06

I understand these nations have limited

15:08

capabilities despite being very rich

15:10

countries nobody else can project power

15:11

there and do this but uh but that said

15:14

um we're we're we we think that mission

15:16

is going to bear fruit and it's

15:18

necessary we can't have a band of

15:19

criminals controlling that in the case

15:21

of Iran I don't know of any country in

15:23

the world that's excited about Iran ever

15:24

having a nuclear weapons capability um

15:27

some are more forceful about it than

15:28

others uh we've had talks about that as

15:30

you know the president would like to

15:32

figure out what's going to happen there

15:33

but he's also made it clear that there's

15:35

not going to be a nuclear armed Iran

15:36

that's not going to happen under his

15:37

watch mr secretary what's your message

15:40

to foreign citizens who may be afraid to

15:42

come to the United States because

15:44

they're concerned about potentially

15:46

being detained over some minor admin

15:48

administrative error or because they

15:50

might have something on their phone like

15:51

criticism of the president or of the

15:53

Israel Gaza conflict no no no come into

15:56

the United States no first of all those

15:59

people that have their phones looked at

16:00

and so forth and you know you'll have to

16:01

I'll refer you to CBP to go through

16:03

their processes but generally it's

16:05

people that have been flagged coming in

16:06

for a reason i would say that if you're

16:08

not coming to the United States to join

16:10

a Hamas protest or to come here and tell

16:11

us about how right Hamas is or to tell

16:14

us about you know stir up conflict on

16:16

our campuses and create riots in our

16:18

street and vandalize our universities

16:20

then you have nothing to worry about but

16:23

thousands thousands and thousands of

16:24

people come into the US every single day

16:26

to conduct business to travel uh to do

16:28

all sorts to visit relatives it happens

16:30

every day it's it's very common place

16:31

and nobody has a problem i mean if

16:33

you're coming here to create problems

16:34

you're you're probably going to have a

16:35

problem and I think that's a good thing

16:36

if you're coming here to create problems

16:38

not here to the United States you're

16:40

probably going to have a problem yeah

16:41

we're not we're not going to continue to

16:42

be stupid enough to let people into our

16:44

country who are coming here to tear

16:46

things up not going to happen mr

16:47

secretary have the Russians done

16:50

anything concrete to make you encouraged

16:52

that they are truly interested in peace

16:53

and when you talk about timeline I know

16:55

you're not going to give a specific

16:55

timeline but you talking weeks are you

16:57

talking months i think we're talking

17:00

weeks probably yeah i mean you know

17:02

there's a lot that has to happen here in

17:04

the next few weeks in order for this to

17:05

be real in terms of concrete um they've

17:09

agreed to certain things i mean I think

17:11

their things are not striking now that

17:12

they were before obviously both sides

17:14

claim that the ceasefire is being

17:16

violated as typical of ceasefires like

17:17

this but that said not concrete in terms

17:20

of are we closer to peace we're closer

17:22

to peace simply because we're talking to

17:23

both sides but we're not closer to peace

17:25

because we have a deal on our hands to

17:27

end this conflict but we're going to

17:28

know soon enough that's my point I make

17:30

everybody you know people come "Oh well

17:32

Putin you can't trust him." This is not

17:33

about trusting Putin not about trusting

17:35

anybody this is about actions if you're

17:38

interested in peace you stop fighting

17:40

and you and you lay out the conditions

17:41

by which you're willing to end a war and

17:43

they have to be reasonable conditions

17:44

right not crazy stuff if you're

17:46

interested in peace that's what you do

17:48

if you're not interested in peace then

17:49

you sort of drag it out and you come up

17:51

with excuses and you pull and we know

17:53

that and we're not going to get pulled

17:54

into that but let's hope it doesn't come

17:56

to that let's hope it you know let's

17:57

let's let's be optimistic that that

18:00

that's not the direction we're going

18:01

we're prepared if it is but let's hope

18:03

that we're not heading in a direction of

18:04

this is just a delay tactic all right

18:06

one more and then we wrap up don't you

18:08

guys want to go home the ones that came

18:09

with us your allies here and also

18:11

Ukraine they believe that Russia is

18:13

actually preparing for another to launch

18:14

another campaign some mil campaign as

18:17

soon as the winter season ends do you

18:19

have any reason to to doubt that that

18:22

they're going to do what i'm sorry the

18:23

Russians Russians are they are preparing

18:25

to start another military camp well then

18:27

we'll know they're not interested in

18:28

peace and at this very moment they're

18:30

targeting energy sites can I get your

18:32

reaction they're targeting what i'm so

18:33

sorry energy sites in Ukraine well again

18:36

this is I get that means they're

18:38

violating the ceasefire that's not a

18:39

good sign you know but I think that

18:41

would tell you this that ultimately this

18:42

is a war right now things are going to

18:44

be blowing up in Ukraine and inside of

18:45

Russia because there's still a war going

18:47

on that's what we're trying to end okay

18:49

if we have a true ceasefire which is

18:50

what we wanted a complete ceasefire

18:52

nothing should be blowing up but the

18:54

Russians didn't agree to that they

18:56

wanted a partial and then obviously when

18:58

you get into these partials that's one

18:59

of the reasons why we didn't push for a

19:00

partial we'll take it because it's

19:02

better than nothing but one of the

19:03

reasons why didn't we push why we didn't

19:05

push for a partial because there's

19:06

always disputes about what are you

19:08

hitting and what you're not hitting but

19:10

in the end this is still a war and we

19:12

want it to stop the fact that religious

19:14

sites are being hit or energy sites are

19:16

being hit or civilian sites are being

19:18

hit that's why war is a bad thing and

19:20

that's why the president wants to end it

19:22

as far as them conducting another

19:23

campaign well then that'll be a very

19:25

clear sign right if all of a sudden we

19:27

wake up tomorrow and the Russians are

19:28

launching a massive offensive then I

19:30

think that's a pretty clear sign they're

19:32

not interested in peace that hasn't

19:33

happened yet let's hope it doesn't

19:35

happen we want to know whether they want

19:37

to do peace or not and if they do then

19:38

there's a way there and we're willing to

19:40

help if they're not then it's good to

19:42

know early so we can adjust our policies

19:44

accordingly all right everybody thank

19:45

you so much thank you guys thank you

19:47

guys