Canadian media keeps under representing world news ..We
have a right to be informed .
ood evening. Your visit to China is unprecedented. You have been working for 4 days. During this time, you have seen the chairman of the Chinese embassy many times. How do you assess the results of the Russian Chinese talks? And most importantly, what do you make of this long-term visit? It is really long-term. As you said, this is due to the fact that there were several events here. When we were planning this work, we planned it in such a way that there was no need to travel to such long distances several times. Let me remind you that it was the SEO summit, then the trilateral meeting between Russia and Mongolia, China, and a visit to the People's Republic of China. I must say that such a format of work allows not only to talk at the negotiating table but most importantly allows to meet in an informal setting many times and to talk in an absolutely informal friendly atmosphere on any topic that is of mutual interest. This turned out to be very important and very useful. As for the results they are very positive in my opinion. The documents that were adopted and adopted by all participants are aimed at the future. In this regard, I would like to note the Chinese initiative on global governance. It seems to me that it is very timely and that it is important and that this initiative is aimed at the positive work between the countries that have gathered at the summit in China and our possible partners among the countries that do not wish to declare this partnership to this day. All this together and the unity of all those who have gathered is a very important demonstration of a positive attitude and confidence that we will be able to achieve our goals. I would like to continue the topic of your visit to China on the bilateral agenda. A solid package of documents was signed as a result of your visit and first of all the documents related to the Siberia 2 project. This project has become the light motif of all highlevel talks in recent times and an indicator of Russia China relations in the world. What do you think of the agreements that have been reached? Is it possible to say that those ideas that exist about relations between Russia and China in the world are being ignored and that attempts to interfere with them affect relations between the two countries? To be honest, I do not even understand what you are talking about. I am busy with my current work and I try to be less involved in all sorts of rumors and speculations. As you said, this is work that has been carried out for a long time. Our partners and I have been discussing it for a long time. There have been several roots. They have pros and cons. Negotiations have been going on for a long time, more than a year. But we all know that the global economy despite the recession in the leading economies of the Euro zone in many countries is developing especially in the Asia-Pacific region. Energy resources demand is growing including in the Chinese economy which remains one of the locomotives of the global economy. In fact, this growth comes from the base. Some say that the pace of GDP growth has slowed. Yes, it has. But the base has grown over this time and the 5% that we are seeing today are already 5% higher than 10 to 15 years ago. What does this lead to? It leads to an increase in demand for energy resources. Finally, we have found a consensus of negotiating parties. You know, there is no charity here on either side. These are mutually beneficial agreements. They are implemented on the basis of market principles based on the principles that are being established in this region. By the way, the price for this product is formulated not based on today's prices but based on a certain formula. This formula is purely objective and market-based. Therefore, there is a growing demand in the Chinese economy. We have the opportunity to supply this raw material. In the end, this is not a prelude to our meeting. This is simply the result of the many years of work of economic entities on both sides. Of course, this will create competitive advantages for our Chinese friends because I repeat, they will receive the product at market prices, not at some high prices as we see now in the same Euro zone. Most importantly, this is a stable and reliable supply. Everyone is satisfied. Everyone is satisfied with this result. To be honest, Gasprom is one of our leading companies. New markets are expanding. In Mongolia, we will have 50 billion and now we have 38 billion and then a couple of more routes which will also increase. In general, we will get more than 100 billion cubic meters of gas. You often talk about the root causes of the Ukrainian crisis when the country began to be dragged into NATO. But now we see that European leaders who declare and discuss certain guarantees of security for Ukraine are almost completely focused on deploying their troops in Ukraine. At the same time, many continue to insist on Ukraine's entry into the EU. But we also see that the EU is rapidly turning into a kind of economic union, a kind of military political block where there are almost always aggressive decisions, aggressive statements. How can you comment on all this? I agree with those who believe that each country has the right to choose the system of ensuring its security. This applies to all countries including Ukraine. But this also means that the security of one country cannot be insured by the security of another country, in this case the Russian Federation. We have always opposed Ukraine being a member of this North Atlantic block, but we have never questioned its right to carry out its economic activities as it pleases, including its membership in the EU. Can we talk about Ukraine? Yes, you can. Hello, Mr. Putin. When Russia and the United States are now discussing the peaceful settlement of the situation in Ukraine, it is more and more common to hear the phrase security guarantees in exchange for territory. Does this correspond to what you said to Trump in Alaska? And what do your words mean when you said that Russia is ready to join the development of these guarantees? Who should be the guarantor in your opinion? And if you allow me about Zelinski, does it make sense to meet with him now in the current conditions? Is it possible to draw up some kind of agreement at this meeting? The United States is now making some assumptions that there is a formula for security guarantees in exchange for territory. No, we have never raised or discussed such a question. Security guarantees are natural. I often say this. We assume that any country should have these security guarantees, including Ukraine. But this has nothing to do with any kind of exchange, especially with the exchange of territory. To be honest, and I would like to emphasize this, we are not fighting for territory, but for human rights and for the rights of the people who live in these territories to speak their own language, to live within their culture and traditions, which have been passed down from previous generations, from their fathers, from their grandfathers and so on. This is primarily what we are talking about. And if these people during the electoral and democratic procedures, including during the referendums, have spoken out in favor of being a part of the Russian Federation, this opinion must be respected. This is democracy. I would like to remind those who forget about it. And above all else, this is in complete accordance with international law. I would also like to remind you of the first articles of the United Nations Charter where it is written directly about the right of nations to self-determination. But we do not associate one thing with another. Territory and security guarantees of course can be said to be close topics but we do not directly associate them with each other. And so the question was not raised during the discussion in Anchorage. As for possible meetings with Mr. Zelinski, I have already spoken about this. In general, I have never ruled out the possibility of such a meeting. Is there any sense in these meetings? Look, let's see. in accordance with the constitution of Ukraine. Some may agree with it, some may not. We just need to read the text carefully. There are no ways to extend the powers of the president of Ukraine in the constitution of Ukraine. None at all. He was elected for 5 years. 5 years have passed. That's it. The powers are over. There is a situation in which elections are not held in a military situation. This is true. But this does not mean that the powers of the president are prolonged. This means that his powers are exhausted and his rights are transferred to the speaker of the rod, including his powers as the supreme commander-in-chief. So, what should the current authorities do? If they want to be legitimate and take full part in the process of their regulation, they must hold elections. I mean, not elections, I'm sorry. They must hold a referendum in accordance with the constitution of Ukraine. Any issues on the territory are resolved only by a referendum as far as I remember. But a referendum cannot be held in a military situation. This is also a constitutional situation of the constitution. In order to hold a referendum, a military situation must be abolished. But as soon as this is done, elections must be held and this process will last indefinitely. The outcome of the elections is not clear. But whatever the outcome, it is necessary to obtain the corresponding conclusion of the constitutional court. This is how it is written in the constitution. But how can we obtain the conclusion of the constitutional court? If after the authorities demanded from the constitutional court of Ukraine to approve the extension of the president's powers and the president actually refused to do this, do you know what they did in Ukraine? It is funny, but it is a fact. The security forces stopped sending the president of the constitutional court to his workplace. That's it. This is the end of the film. Well, not quite because as far as I know, I don't know where he is now, but he once went abroad. But in recent years, some members of the constitutional court have lost their powers. They don't have a quorum to make decisions. Therefore, this is a dead end. If we just hold a meeting with the current head of the administration, let's put it this way, it is possible. and I have never refused to do so if this meeting is well prepared and will lead to some positive possible results. By the way, Donald asked me if it is possible to hold such a meeting. I said yes, it is possible. In the end, if Zelinsky is ready, let him come to Moscow. Such a meeting will take place. Can it be done? Yes, it can. Good evening. Do you think that the multilateral world which you talked about in your Munich speech in 2007 and the new empires Russia, India and China have already been created? Or is there something to strive for? And if I may, one more question. A few hours ago, the German chancellor, Mr. MS, called you perhaps the most serious military criminal of our time. What do you think about this? I see. As for whether or not the multilateral world has been created, in general, its contours of course have been created. But at the same time, I would not talk about any dominance in this multilateral world. When we talk about multilaterality, it does not mean that some new hegamman should appear. No one asks such questions. Not within the framework of the sho, not within the framework of the bricks. All members of the international community should have equal rights and everyone from the point of view of international law should be in the same position. Yes, of course, there are economic giants such as India, China. By the way, our country is among the four largest countries in the world in terms of purchasing power. This is all in the reality of today. These are not our calculations. These are the calculations of international organizations. But this does not mean that someone should dominate in politics or in some other sphere including security. Therefore, we do not agree that some new dominant state should appear. Everyone should be equal. As for the statements you have just made, Pesco also told me about this a few minutes ago. What do I think about this? I think that this is an unsuccessful attempt to remove not from him personally, but from his country and from the collective west in general to take responsibility for the tragedy that is happening in Ukraine. Now, what do I mean? Let me remind you, as I have said many times, that in 2014, the ministers of three European countries came to Kiev and put their signatures under a document that was essentially an agreement between the current government, President Yanukovic at the time, and the opposition. In accordance with this agreement, all controversial issues of political nature should have been resolved in the constitutional sphere, peacefully, legally. And just a day or two later, there was a coup detit a bloody cruelty. None of these guarantors moved a finger to bring the situation back to the legal sphere. This is how the conflict began. Because right after that, the events in Crimea began. Right after that, the Kiev regime carried out hostilities using armored vehicles and aviation against the peaceful population of those regions of Ukraine that did not agree with this coup d'etat. And then all our attempts to solve this problem with peaceful means were put to the side and in fact publicly refused to implement the Minsk agreements. So who is to blame for the tragedy that is happening? Those who brought this situation to the four ignoring Russia's interests in the sphere of its security. If you think that you can be so indifferent to the people of our country, you should know that we will never allow such things to happen when Russia looks involuntarily at the events surrounding it and does not react in any way. Good evening. I am Olga Scabiva from the Russian TV channel. In Europe, more and more often than not, people are talking about the need to take our money, $300 billion, and hand it over to Ukraine. Of course, there are those who think that this is not very beautiful and very dangerous, but there are more of those who are ready to achieve and suppress theft. How do you feel about this? And one more important question about the special operation, Vladimir Vladimir, there is a chance that it will end soon. How do you feel about this? Do you feel it? Are we moving towards the end? I will start with the second part since it is the key one. Back in 2022, we offered the Ukrainian authorities to respect the choice of those people who live in the southeast of Ukraine to withdraw their troops from there and to end this conflict immediately. I must say that in general this did not cause a complete rejection. But after we on the insistence of our Western European colleagues withdrew our troops from Kiev, the situation immediately changed. We were told almost literally that now we will fight until either you turn your heads away from us or we will turn our heads away from you. I do not remember whether I ever said this publicly or not, but it sounded something like this, only in more crude expressions, but quite openly and oddly enough in a friendly way. Now it is either us or you. And so it goes on. Nevertheless, I believe that if common sense still prevails, then it is possible to agree on an acceptable option to end this conflict. This is what I will say. Moreover, we can see the mood of the current US administration under the leadership of President Trump. We see not just a call but a sincere desire to find a solution. I think there is a certain light at the end of the tunnel. Let us see how the situation unfolds. If not, we will have to solve all the problems we are faced with by arms. You did not answer my question about Europe if I may. Oh, about money laundering. We have spoken about this many times. I do not think there is anything new to say here. We said that some people want to take it, some do not. Those who are smarter do not want it. Yes, it is true. I am not trying to be ironic or to mislead those who are more stupid. Why? Because those who are smarter are people who deal with finance and economics. They understand that this will destroy all the principles of international economic and financial activity. Without a doubt, it will do great harm to the global economy and international finance. This is how alliances are formed in many countries around the world that are trying to implement their own economic development plans within their respective regions. In this case, economic separatism will only intensify and the overall financial and economic order will be destroyed. Could you please share the latest information on the situation in the area of special military operations? If it is not a secret, what reports have you received from the commanding fronts? In general, how much has the situation on the battlefield changed recently? All groups of the Russian armed forces are advancing in all directions. They are advancing successfully at different paces. Well, in almost all directions. I will not read them all. If you represent Zvezda TV channel, you know the names of those groups and the direction of their combat operations. How does the enemy react to this? What we see is that it is trying to fill the gaps so to say by transferring the most capable units from one region which is quite difficult for it to other areas of combat operations which it considers more critical. For example, if my memory serves me correctly, quite recently, we need to check, of course, since we are in Beijing and not in Moscow, the enemy transferred the 95th brigade from the sum sky direction to another area. What is it easier for them in the sum sky direction? No, they simply replaced it with less capable units while the 95th brigade was transferred to where it considers more critical. This is the case throughout the entire line of combat. You cannot relax from one area to another. It can be anything. It can be preparing the reserves to carry out some more or less large-scale actions. But preliminary analysis by our military experts shows that the enemy does not have such capabilities in the armed forces of Ukraine today. They are not capable of carrying out large-scale offensive operations, but they are engaged only in holding the existing borders. This is not a one-off example. It happens almost throughout the entire line of combat. This is evidence that not only we but also western experts believe that the armed forces have fewer and fewer reserves but the combat ready units are not equipped with more than 47 to 48% today. This is already the most critical feature of the situation. Nevertheless, combat operations are both difficult and cruel. So we should not make any predictions here. This is the kind of analysis I was just talking about. Good evening, Eagles Danov, Arty Vladimir Vladimir, going back to Alaska. You immediately began to communicate with US President Donald Trump right after landing on the red carpet. Then after taking the photo, you got into the car with him and continued your conversation. Could you please tell us what you were talking about? What language were you speaking? What were the details of your conversation? Thank you very much. Of course, we were speaking in English, but the broken part of my vocabulary remains partially intact. At the very beginning, I told him at the press conference, I said, "I am very glad to see you, dear neighbor, healthy and alive." While we were driving in a limousine, it took us 30 seconds to get there. We used general phrases and that was it. What did you talk about? What? I told him there is no secret. I told him what we negotiated in Alaska. One moment, please. What was the question? A cultural question. All questions are cultural. Our relations with China develop not only in the sphere of economy and energy, but also in the sphere of culture. One of the significant events of this year is the release of the joint film Red Silk. You told this to Xi Jinping during his visit to Moscow in May. You mentioned it in an interview with Shinua. Tell us, will there be similar projects in the future? Perhaps you also managed to see Red Silk. Share your emotions. In general, it was the idea of Xi Jinping himself. We were at one of the events and I drew attention to the fact that it is very difficult for our producers to break into the Chinese market. But he smiled and said, "Let's produce joint films and then the market will be open." Indeed, it is. One of the first swallows is Red Silk. I have not seen this film, but I know that it will be presented here tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. In general, the film is very popular and people watch it with pleasure. And of course, we have our own projects. If you are interested, you can ask the Minister of Culture. She will tell you more about all the plans that are in this regard. As far as I know, we are already working on other joint films. This is a really good way to work in the huge, powerful, and attractive Chinese market. Vladimir Vladimir, if you don't mind, let's continue on the subject of cinema. A film has just been released in the west in which one of the characters is you. The film is called The Kremlin Sorcerer. Have you seen this film? Have you been shown in the film? By the way, your role was played by the British actor Jude Law. No, I haven't seen this film. This is the first time I've heard about it. I can't comment on anything because I don't know. If you don't mind, I'd like to continue on another topic. You've just touched on the topic of health. Today, you and the chairman of the CEC discussed age, immortality, organ transplantation. I didn't even pay attention to that. Do you really think that people will be able to live for 150 years or longer? Oh yes. When we were going to the parade, the chairman was talking about it. Well, yes, Mr. Burlesone was actively developing this topic at one time. Well, yes, modern medicine, even surgical ones related to organ transplantation, allow humanity to hope that active life will not continue as it is today. The average age in different countries is different, but nevertheless, the life expectancy will significantly increase. You know, I don't remember what year it was given to. I think it was the UN, but I think it was in the 1950s. We'll have to look into it. I may be wrong, but I'll tell you what it's all about. By 2050, there will be more people on the planet who are 65 years older than 56-year-old children. This will have both social, political, and economic consequences. We'll have to think about it when we talk about life expectancy. Vladimir Vladimir, may I ask a question? Yes, thank you. Going back to the topic of your visit, this summit was probably the largest in the organization's history. What is the role of this organization in the current turbulent world? And will it be able to become a kind of political alliance that will more effectively resist the threat coming from the West? Thank you. Shustikovic is not intended to resist anyone. We do not pose such a challenge to ourselves. I would like to draw your attention to the fact that during the discussions and bilateral meetings, there has never been anything that could be called a confrontational beginning. First of all, we are all set to work together with a positive outcome. We are not thinking about how to outplay someone or achieve better results in the philosophy of rivalry. No, we are just thinking about how to better organize our own work. By working together, we can achieve positive results. This is what I wanted to say. May I ask a question on the same topic? Yes, you may. Excuse me, please. Vladimir Vladimir, Europe is now preparing the 19th package of sanctions and it is no longer a threat to us, but to our partners. How do we feel about this? You have spoken to a huge number of Shuro members and partners who may be seriously affected by this including India and China. What do they think about this? How can we react to this? Who do you think will be more affected by this? You know, oddly enough, we have not discussed this topic. Why? Because to be honest, it does not concern us. These events in Ukraine are just a prelude to resolving economic issues in relation to a number of countries whose economic relations do not please some people. For example, yes, there is a disproportion in trade between the United States and India, the United States and China, but there is no disproportion in economic relations between Brazil and the United States. This is the first point. The second point is that the deadline was set for August 8th and additional sanctions were introduced against Brazil on August 6th. What does Ukraine have to do with this? Although there were references to Ukraine, what does it have to do with it? It has nothing to do with it. There are problems there. There are problems in the domestic political situation, including in the relations between the current authorities and former President Bonero. What does Ukraine have to do with it? It has nothing to do with it. This is the first point. The second point is that yes, there are problems and imbalances in trade, but in our opinion, they should be resolved during the negotiation process. We have just held very long and detailed consultations with some of our partners. I will not talk about them now. We also have an imbalance with some of them. It is not in our interest. But what are we striving for? We are striving to reach an agreement with our partners on what they could give us, what we could give them, and find a solution to these problems during this joint work. By the way, one of our partners and I have three times the supply to our market, which is three times more than what we supply to our partners' market. We are gaining patience and looking for a solution. This is the first point, but also with our own intraolitical laws. You see when they say from the outside we are going to torture you we are going to punish you. But how can the leadership of such powerful and large countries which have gone through very difficult periods in their history related to colonialism with attempts to invade their sovereignty for a long period of time. How should they react? If one of them shows weakness, the political career is over just as the colonial era is over. It is impossible to talk to such partners in such a tone today. It seems to me that in the end everything will fall into place and we will return to a normal economic dialogue. We have one last question. You said that you are ready to raise the level of the negotiating group in contact with Ukraine. Tell us please who could it be Sergey Lavro for example your assistant Ashikov or the head of the Barucian defense ministry? And in this context, are you satisfied with the results of the previous group's negotiations and in particular Medinsky's work? I am satisfied with Medinsk's work. If there is a need to do something to raise the level, to bring it to a political level, we are ready to do it. I would not like to specify any specific names now, but we are ready to raise it to a truly high political level. The result is important and I think that what our negotiating group is doing now led by my assistant Vladimir Medinsky is a good example of restraint and professionalism. Yes, let's talk about him. Maybe you should ask him about him. The fact is that I wanted to talk to you about the work of Steve Wickoff. The fact is that now in the west there is a wave of very harsh criticism against him from both the media and politicians. He is accused of misunderstanding you at the negotiations, of misrepresenting the US President Donald Trump during the negotiations with you, and that he sympathizes too much with Russia. How would you assess his work? Thank you. It is not my task or my business to assess the work of the US president's assistant. It should be assessed by the person who is his employer, namely President Trump. I am absolutely convinced that Mr. Wickoff is exposing the position of the US president and not any other in his contacts with me and other members of the Russian leadership and our talks at the anchorage showed that it was clear from the context of our talks that he was faithfully conveying the position of the Russian side to President Trump and the fact that he was bringing this position of the US leadership to us was absolutely obvious to me during the discussions at the anchorage because what Mr. Wickorf and I discussed was the same. We fully confirmed President Trump's presence and he did not object to the fact that this was his position. There are a lot of very complex issues there. This is true. But I think this is what it is all about. This is how those who do not like this position speak to criticism of Mr. WhitF. But they do not like Trump's position either. This is what it is all about. There may be different approaches to settlement. There are those who say that we need to fight until the last Ukrainian. And there are those, as some in Europe are trying to do now. And there are those, for example, representatives of the current US administration and the president himself who are trying to find a solution and a solution by peaceful means. And the first party, the party of war, always attacks the other party, the party of peace. And everything else is speculation and some insinuations attempts to reinforce their position. That's all. Yes. about Trump. I just said that today, even before the parade, Trump commented on this parade and said that he hoped that she would remember the American soldiers who helped China in World War II. And he wrote, "I don't know whether it was sarcasm or not." The phrase, "Give my warmest wishes to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un while you are building a conspiracy against the United States." How can you comment on this? The president of the United States is not without humor. Everything is clear. We all know him well. I have a good relationship with him. We communicate with each other by name. I can tell you and I hope you will hear it too, how strange it seems to me that during all these four days, in the course of the most diverse negotiations, both in the informal and in the formal sense, no one has ever expressed any negative judgments against the current US administration. This is the first thing. Second, all of my interlocutors without exception, I would like to emphasize all of them supported our meeting in Anchorage. All of them and they all expressed their hope that the position of President Trump and the position of Russia and other participants in the negotiations would lead to the end of the armed conflict. This is without any irony, without any jokes. Since I say this in public and the whole world will see and hear it, this is the best guarantee that I'm telling the truth because it will be heard by the people I have been talking to during these four days. they will definitely say yes it is true and I would never do this if it were not so because then I would look pale in front of my friends allies and strategic partners. This is exactly how it was as I said and once again I would like to return to what I told your colleagues on my right. The activities of our partners including strategic partners are not aimed at fighting anyone. They are aimed at looking for the best ways to develop our countries our peoples and our economies. Please, recently various statements have been made to Russia from Baku. I would like to know how you assess the current state of relations between our two countries, what has happened between us and how we can forge a dialogue. Thank you. You said that you wanted to ask a question and you asked four questions at once. May I answer briefly? Well, there are always some questions in relations between our countries based on the current situation or some political situation. There are problems. Well, today we said hello to President Malv. I said hello to him and to his wife. We exchanged a couple of words, but I believe that the fundamental relationship between Azabai Jan and Russia and mutual interest in their development will eventually be restored. Valentin Alfimov Comimla Pravda Vladimir Vladimir, we talk a lot today about peace in Ukraine, about the agreements with Trump, what Europe offers, what they are afraid of in Ukraine, your opinion. But it seems to me that we have not touched on one question. Perhaps the most important one. As each of you says, the most important one. You regularly receive reports from the battlefields. And we know that you regularly communicate with the commanders in the trenches and with the fighters in the trenches. What do they say about peace? Are they ready to accept the truce or these agreements? Or do they insist on fighting to the very end, to the victorious end? Most of them, I would like to emphasize, most of them want Russia to achieve all its goals set out at the beginning of the special military operation. Everything else is secondary and how, of course, by peaceful means, by peaceful means. We offer them in the direct and figurative sense of the word efforts. We will repeatedly see how this process will develop, including with the assistance of the current administration. Vladimir Vladimir, Elena Nephoddova, Gazetta Isvestia. At the one courage summit, you invited Donald Trump to visit Moscow and meet with you there. Tell us please, is there any preparation for this meeting? Are there any agreements already? And maybe you even know the approximate dates of the meeting. The dates are unknown. There is no preparation for the meeting, but the invitation is on the table. Yes, please. Vladimir Vladimir Ludm Miller Alexandrova Moscow consumol member you say that Russia and China stand for a just world order based on a global majority. Please tell us in the current world system. What do you think is unfair and what mechanisms could solve this? It is unfair to say that this is a unipolar world. The fact is that we are going to build our relations not on the basis of a majority but on the basis of the idea that everyone not on the basis of quantity but on the basis of ideas will build their relations. As I have already said the idea is that the world should be multipolar which means that all members of the international community should be equal. There should be no more equals. The unipolar world should cease to exist including in the interests of the peoples of those countries whose leadership is still defending this rejuvenating system. That is all I have to say. Thank you very much. Goodbye.
.
From Beijing, Russian President Vladimir Putin delivers his strongest defence of India yet amid Donald Trump's escalating trade war. Speaking at a press conference, Putin issued a clear message about the importance of treating India with dignity and respect on the world stage. He also touched on multipolarity, Russia-India ties, and global cooperation. Watch the full press conference with English translation.
0:08
0:15
0:21
0:26
0:31
0:38
0:44
0:50
0:56
1:03
1:08
1:15
1:21
1:26
1:32
1:39
1:46
1:52
1:58
2:03
2:10
2:16
2:23
2:28
2:34
2:40
2:47
2:55
3:00
3:08
3:13
3:18
3:25
3:31
3:38
3:45
3:51
3:58
4:03
4:11
4:16
4:23
4:29
4:36
4:41
4:49
4:54
5:00
5:06
5:12
5:18
5:23
5:28
5:35
5:41
5:47
5:53
5:59
6:05
6:11
6:19
6:26
6:32
6:39
6:46
6:53
6:58
7:05
7:11
7:16
7:23
7:29
7:35
7:42
7:47
7:52
7:59
8:05
8:11
8:17
8:24
8:30
8:37
8:43
8:50
8:56
9:03
9:09
9:15
9:21
9:29
9:35
9:42
9:48
9:54
10:00
10:07
10:17
10:23
10:30
10:37
10:44
10:51
10:56
11:03
11:10
11:16
11:23
11:30
11:36
11:42
11:50
11:56
12:02
12:08
12:15
12:22
12:29
12:34
12:41
12:46
12:51
12:57
13:04
13:10
13:16
13:23
13:28
13:36
13:41
13:48
13:54
14:01
14:06
14:11
14:17
14:23
14:28
14:34
14:40
14:49
14:54
15:01
15:08
15:13
15:20
15:25
15:32
15:38
15:45
15:51
15:58
16:04
16:11
16:17
16:24
16:30
16:38
16:44
16:49
16:55
17:01
17:07
17:14
17:19
17:25
17:30
17:36
17:42
17:47
17:52
17:58
18:03
18:09
18:15
18:21
18:27
18:34
18:41
18:47
18:53
19:00
19:08
19:13
19:19
19:24
19:31
19:37
19:43
19:48
19:54
20:00
20:06
20:12
20:19
20:24
20:30
20:37
20:44
20:51
20:57
21:05
21:10
21:17
21:22
21:28
21:34
21:41
21:46
21:52
21:57
22:03
22:08
22:15
22:20
22:28
22:35
22:40
22:47
22:53
23:01
23:06
23:13
23:18
23:23
23:29
23:37
23:43
23:48
23:54
24:00
24:06
24:12
24:19
24:25
24:32
24:39
24:45
24:52
24:59
25:05
25:13
25:18
25:24
25:29
25:36
25:42
25:47
25:54
26:01
26:07
26:13
26:20
26:26
26:32
26:40
26:45
26:52
26:59
27:06
27:13
27:19
27:24
27:32
27:38
27:44
27:50
27:56
28:02
28:08
28:15
28:22
28:29
28:35
28:40
28:45
28:52
28:58
29:06
29:11
29:18
29:24
29:30
29:37
29:42
29:48
29:55
30:01
30:07
30:13
30:18
30:24
30:30
30:36
30:42
30:48
30:54
31:01
31:07
31:12
31:18
31:24
31:29
31:36
31:42
31:47
31:55
32:00
32:08
32:13
32:18
32:24
32:29
32:35
32:41
32:47
32:54
33:01
33:07
33:12
33:18
33:25
33:30
33:36
33:43
33:49
33:55
34:02
No comments:
Post a Comment