Thursday, May 15, 2014

Google must respect 'right to be forgotten'

Court of Justice of the European Union ruling highlights free speech vs. privacy debate

 
Bloggers note: also see http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-05/cp140070en.pdf  
 
and
  http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-05-13/google-faces-data-demand-as-eu-court-backs-right-to-be-forgotten.html
 
Thomson ReutersPosted: May 13, 2014 9:15 AM ETLast Updated: May 13, 2014 10:29 PM ET
Google must respect 'right to be forgotten' 3:27

Internet companies can be made to remove irrelevant or excessive personal information from search engine results, Europe's top court ruled on Tuesday in a case pitting privacy campaigners against Google.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) upheld the complaint of a Spanish man who objected to the fact that Google searches on his name threw up links to a 1998 newspaper article about the repossession of his home.

The case highlighted the struggle in cyberspace between free speech advocates and supporters of privacy rights who say people should have the "right to be forgotten" — meaning that they should be able to remove their digital traces from the internet.

It creates both technical challenges and potential extra costs for companies like Google, the world's no.1 search engine, and Facebook.

Google can be required to remove data that are "inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in relation to the purposes for which they were processed and in the light of the time that has elapsed," said judges at the Luxembourg-based court.

The ECJ said the rights of people whose privacy has been infringed outweighed the general public interest.
Google said it was disappointed with the ruling, which contradicted a non-binding opinion from the ECJ's court adviser last year that said deleting sensitive information from search results would interfere with freedom of expression.

"We are very surprised that it differs so dramatically from the Advocate General's opinion and the warnings and consequences that he spelled out. We now need to take time to analyze the implications," said Google spokesman Al Verney.

The European Commission proposed in 2012 that people should have the "right to be forgotten" on the internet. This was watered down by the European Parliament last year in favour of a "right to erasure" of specific information.
The proposal needs the blessing of the 28 European Union governments before it can become law. Google, Facebook and other internet companies have lobbied against such plans, worried about the extra costs.

The issues of privacy and data protection in Europe have become all the more sensitive since a former U.S. intelligence contractor, Edward Snowden, leaked details last year of U.S. surveillance programs for monitoring vast quantities of emails and phone records worldwide.

Extra costs

Tuesday's court ruling will likely benefit ordinary people but not public figures, said Larry Cohen, a partner at law firm Latham & Watkins.

"The ruling will help certain people hide their past, making it difficult to access certain information, but not when it concerns public figures, or people in whom there is a genuine public interest," he said.

"This will result in added costs for internet search providers who will have to add to their take-down policies the means for removing links to an individual's data, and develop criteria for distinguishing public figures from private individuals," he said.

The Spanish data protection agency said the case was one of 220 similar ones in Spain whose complainants want Google to delete their personal information from the web.

"We are very satisfied that there is an end now to the ferocious resistance shown by the search engine to comply with the resolutions of the Spanish data protection agency in this matter," a spokeswoman for the agency said.

European Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding said that the court ruling vindicated EU efforts to toughen up privacy rules.

"Companies can no longer hide behind their servers being based in California or anywhere else in the world," she said on her Facebook page, calling the judgment a "strong tailwind" for data protection reform.

Google suffered a previous privacy setback earlier this year when a German court ordered it to block search results in Germany linked to photos of a sex party involving former Formula One motor racing boss Max Mosley.

Saturday, April 26, 2014

★ TOP 15 BIGGEST WARSHIPS IN THE WORLD 2014 ★ 4570

Paul s note: Now I do not want to scare anyone ...but are we spending our wold taxes to dangerous toys ..that one day will cease to protect us and destroy us...

TAKE ONE HOUR ON MY BLOG AND LEARN MORE ABOUT WHO THE WARlords ARE AND WITH WHO s MONEY THEY PLAY.







Published on Mar 9, 2013

TOP 15 BIGEST WARSHIPS IN THE WORLD 2014

GERALD FORD CLASS AICRAFT CARRIER (USA) 2015
Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carrier (UK) 2018


Nimitz class carrier (USA)


Admiral Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier (Russia)


Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning (China)


INS Vikramaditya (India)


Charles de Gaulle Carrier (France)


Wasp Class (USA)


Nae Sao Paulo (brazil)


Cavour carrier (Italy)


Juan Carlos I - Camberra class (Spain - Australia)


Viraat carrier (India)


Invincible class (UK)


Ocean class (UK)


Mistral class (France)


Hyuga class (Japan)


Dokdo class (south Korea)


SUPER AIRCRAFT CARRIER
top 10 navies, top 10 navy, seals, top 10 fire power, future weapons, 2013, top gear 2013, 2012 end of the world, 2012 world end
https://twitter.com/SkypWarrior
https://www.facebook.com/SkypWarrior

2013 final, top 10 aircraft carriers,US NAVY ROYAL NAVY INDIAN NAVY JAPANESE NAVY CHINESE NAVY FRENCH NAVY KOREAN NAVY ARMADA ESPAÑOLA RUSSIAN NAVY RUSSIA CHINA USA UK FRANCE SPAIN ITALY MARINA MILITARE INDIA SOUTH KOREA SKYPWARRIOR, RAMMSTEINTECNOMETAL, MARINA MAXICANA, NASA space
Aircraft Carriers-Modern Warships-Big bigger the worlds Biggest
Big Bigger Biggest Cruise Ship -- Race To Become The Biggest

BIG BIGGER BIGGEST: aircraft carrier
Aircraft Carriers - Extreme Machines - Discovery Channel Documentary
pentagon attack, iraq war, bin laden dead, afganistan, 9-11 bin laden, top 10 modern surface warships, india vs pakistan, pakistan vs india, isrel vs pakistan, top 10 militaries, top 10 army, top 10 air forces, top 10 nuclear super power, top 10 nuclear submarines, modern warfare 3, call of duty, mw3, battlefield 3, battle tanks, helicopter attack, gunship, portaaviones americanos, m1 abrams, leopard 2, challenger 2, battle ships, destroyer, congoo class, nimizt class, nuclear power, Armada Española, apache, comanche, fragatas f-100, nuclear subs, fragatas españolas, horizon class, russian destroyers, american destroyers, israel vs palestina, israel vs iran, israel vs turkey, turkey vs greece, españa vs marruecos, marocco vs spain, future weapons 2010-2011, india vs pakistan, indian navy vs chinese navy, china vs usa, china vs russia, spain vs italy, españa vs italia, usa vs russia, principe de asturias, cavour, warfare, us navy, royal navy, spanish navy, italian navy
BIG BIGGER BIGGEST: aircraft carrier
Big Bigger Biggest Cruise Ship -- Race To Become The Biggest
NATO Future Aircraft Carriers - YouTube

Aircraft Carriers - Extreme Machines - Discovery Channel Documentary
Aircraft Carriers-Modern Warships-Big bigger the worlds Biggest
Vídeo actualizado a junio de 2012.

las armadas mas poderosas del mundo.
este ranking está basado en:
1º el estudio de las capacidades de alta mar. La guerra de minas y la defensa costera.
2ºdatos de las marinas.
3ºEn la fuerza de escolta, en la capacidad antiaérea. Destaco la capacidad AEGIS de países aliados de los americanos y la capacidad del SA-N-6 ruso. Me parece de una importancia vital destacar la capacidad de estos sistemas para interceptar un ataque de misiles de crucero, hacer control de tráfico aéreo y, quizás en el futuro cercano, la interceptación de un ataque de misiles balísticos y el uso de este sistema de combate en la guerra espacial antisatélite.
4ºEn el aprovisionamiento logístico, únicamente en el aprovisionamiento de combustible en alta mar. Entiendo que el aprovisionamiento de sólidos, munición, etc, se puede realizar con la marina civil (el caso inglés en la guerra de las Malvinas),. en petroleros militares de la capacidad de proyección oceánica y la importancia que tiene ésta en el orden de batalla de una armada.
5ºEn la fuerza submarina entre SSBN (misiles balísticos), SSN (propulsión nuclear) y SS (motor diesel-eléctrico). más importancia a la capacidad nuclear submarina por motivos evidentes.
6ºPoder aéreo y fuerza submarina puntúan triple.
7ºEste ránking en ningún caso indica quién le ganaría la guerra a quién, ya que en combate entran en juego muchos factores que aquí no aparecen reseñados (otras armas, experiencia de combate, si los buques los fabrica o no el propio país, antigüedad de la flota, presencia de bases en el exterior, etc).

"Charles de Gaulle": French Aircraft Carrier / französischer Flugzeugträ...



The nuclear-powered aircraft carrier "Charles de Gaulle" visited the German port of Cuxhaven in April 2012. The vessel is the flag ship of the French navy and took part in a NATO maneuver after the visit.
Der atombetriebene Flugzeugträger "Charles de Gaulle" besuchte im April 2012 Cuxhaven. Das Fahrzeug ist das Flagschiff der französischen Marine und nahm nach dem Besuch in Cuxhaven an einem Nato-Manöver teil.

(1) Megastructures - USS Virginia


The Largest Aircraft Carrier in The World (full video)


Chinese Aircraft Carrier Liaoning Music Video 中国航母 - 《为梦想领跑》宣传片

4560

Chinese Aircraft Carrier Liaoning Music Video 辽宁舰歼15舰载机编队训练MV《飞鲨》 高清 航母MV




Both videos were produced by the state-owned Aviation Industry
Corporation of China (AVIC), which held an official release ceremony in Beijing to showcase the films. At the ceremony, AVIC Spokesman Zhu Hongbin explained the purpose behind the videos. According to Zhu, as quoted by People’s Daily [Chinese],
they were made to increase patriotism enthusiasm, to attract more youngChinese to dedicate themselves to China’s aircraft and aircraft carrierdevelopment projects, and to more generally encourage young Chinese to realize the “Chinese Dream.”
Later, Zhu added that the video was supposed to advance Chinese
people’s understanding of developments in the national security
industry, as well as boosting their nationalistic self-confidence and
self-esteem. Quite a tall order for two videos, each running under seven minutes.

Zhu also tried to claim the video as a step forward in military
transparency. Zhu said that the video creators spent time living with
the aircraft carrier personnel, coming to understand their daily
routines. The video, he said, was an artistic representation of what
actually happens on the carrier. I doubt this is the sort of military transparency
U.S. government officials had in mind, but perhaps that’s not the
point. Zhu seemed more concerned with domestic transparency —allowing the Chinese people themselves a glimpse of the national defense industry’s latest achievements.

Of course, although Zhu didn’t mention it, there’s also an underlying profit motive. AVIC was in charge of refitting the Liaoning after it was purchased from Ukraine, so shining a glamorous spotlight on the carrier reflects well on AVIC. The company also manufactures the carrier-based J-15 aircraft, known as the “Flying Shark,” which are featured heavily in the videos. AVIC even dedicated the videos to all the workers toiling anonymously on China’s aircraft carrier project—a designation that, coincidentally, would include many of AVIC’s own
employees.

So how does one make a music video showcasing an aircraft carrier? Take plenty of glamor shots of Liaoning from afar, particularly when the carrier is bathed in the glow of a sunset. Add footage of handsome men (presumably sailors) working out on the Liaoning’s deck. And of course, the piece de resistance, showcase aircraft actually taking off from the deck and soaring through the air before coming back in for a landing. Finally, add a soaring soundtrack where the singer belts out hyperbolic phrases like “the ocean is surging power” and “sweat endlessly reaps the reward of glory.”


The lyrics of the music video are pretty standard calls to patriotism. The words both extol those who already give their sweat and
blood for China and encourage the country to reach still higher in its quest to fulfill the China dream. The video ends with several lines of text just in case viewers somehow missed the point: “Our homeland will ultimately choose those who are loyal to it. Our homeland will ultimately remember those who dedicate themselves to it. We pay our respects to those heroes who have worked their hearts out for China’s aircraft carrier.”


What’s different is obviously the same thing that attracted worldwide attention in the first place: the inclusion of footage featuring the Liaoning and its sailors. China’s navy has traditionally been relegated to second fiddle, both in the military totem pole and in the popular imagination.

That the Liaoning, perhaps China’s most visible symbol of
national pride, is part of the navy speaks volumes as to the increased stature of this branch of the armed forces. The video is serious PR, not just for Chinese patriotism or even just for the Liaoning, but for the navy as a whole, especially its aviation branch. As one fan of the video told Global Times, the short film “made many people realize that Chinese aircraft could be cool.”


Between these videos and U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel’s recent tour of the Liaoning (the first ever by a foreign official), China is apparently fully ready to roll out its navy’s pride and joy as a PR tool. As Li Jie, an expert from a prominent Chinese military think tank, told Global Times, “this voluntary display reflects the growing confidence of Chinese military power.” Liaoning was always intended as a visible symbol of China’s new military stature—having an aircraft carrier is a milestone for China to pass on its way to becoming a world-class naval power. Now, a year and a half after the Liaoning was commissioned, China is finally comfortable enough with its new toy to start really showing it off.